Think-Aloud
Teacher models internal dialogue while reading (e.g., “This part confuses me; I predict…”) to demonstrate strategy use.
Comprehension is the ultimate goal of reading. We support learners to construct meaning, make connections, and apply ideas through explicit strategies, rich discussion, and purposeful practice.
Definition. Reading comprehension is the process by which readers construct meaning from text. It involves decoding, vocabulary knowledge, background knowledge, inference, and purposeful strategies to monitor and deepen understanding.
Core idea. Comprehension is not passive—readers actively build meaning by connecting text to prior knowledge, asking questions, summarising, and using strategic reading behaviours to resolve ambiguity and refine understanding.
| Component | Description | Classroom Example |
|---|---|---|
| Background Knowledge | Prior information and experiences that readers use to interpret new text. | Pre-reading discussions that activate students’ knowledge about a topic. |
| Vocabulary | Knowledge of word meanings necessary to understand text. | Pre-teach key terms before reading a science passage. |
| Inference | Drawing conclusions and reading between the lines from explicit clues. | Ask: “Why did the character leave?” and support answers with evidence. |
| Monitoring & Metacognition | Awareness of comprehension; strategies to repair misunderstanding. | Teach students to re-read, ask questions, or summarise when confused. |
| Text Structure & Genre | Understanding how different texts are organised and what to expect. | Compare cause–effect paragraphs with narrative structures. |
Comprehension instruction is explicit, scaffolded, and embedded across reading, writing and discussion. Use strategy instruction with modeled think-alouds and guided practice.
Teacher models internal dialogue while reading (e.g., “This part confuses me; I predict…”) to demonstrate strategy use.
Students take turns using summarising, questioning, clarifying and predicting to lead small-group discussions.
Use graphic organisers (Venn, cause–effect, sequence) to visualise relationships and structure.
Students locate textual evidence to support answers, promoting close reading and justification.
Use formative checks, performance tasks and targeted rubrics to evaluate comprehension. Assess both process (strategy use) and product (answers, summaries).
Comprehension difficulties often stem from limited vocabulary, weak decoding, or insufficient background knowledge. Interventions should be targeted to underlying causes.
Model how to spot clues and combine them with background knowledge. Use guided practice with questions that require students to cite textual clues supporting their inferences.
Use a progression: literal (what), inferential (why), evaluative (what if/how). Ensure questions require evidence and reasoning rather than recall alone.
Integrate strategy instruction into daily reading routines. Targeted lessons of 15–30 minutes, combined with guided practice during reading sessions, are effective.
Website security powered by MilesWeb
